#REDACTED SOFTWARE SOFTWARE#
That however, is what many vendors of redaction software uses as examples of the output from their products.īody mounted camera videos pose much greater challenges than most examples allow. Redacting a small group of people who are standing still and seated with a fixed camera poses few challenges. What derives from discussions of these factors is that claims of automated redaction are overblown and that the process of masking targets for blurring is rife with human judgement.īody worn camera videos are not wedding videos At best redacting BWC videos poses three issues:ġ) the nature of the camera and its mountingģ) redaction policies and their interpretation. Without delving into automated redaction technology (a whole other subject), multiple factors need to be addressed before moving on to technology.
That fact causes many to hope for a silver bullet in terms of fully automated redaction. Effective redaction is time consuming and labor intensive. Concerns for personal privacy become vital, so that blurring faces and identifying information–redacting–come into play. Public disclosure raises issues not present in private sharing. Now what was private to the eyes of a claimant attorney is to be disclosed publically. The unfortunate events in the last two years have basically changed the BWC video dynamic.
Privately, showing a BWC video to a claimant's attorney, usually resulted in withdrawing the complaint. It is easy to forget that the original impetus for body worn video camera was to protect officers and deputies from unwarranted allegations of misbehavior in citizen contacts. This article is provided by and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of Police1.
0 kommentar(er)
